Sunday, March 25, 2007

Geog Practice Question 3

Impact of Volcanic Hazards in Developed Countries

The May 18th, 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens in the United States is an example of a Plinian eruption. Describe the volcanic hazards and their effects that resulted from this eruption. (9)

  • Plinian eruption
    -Characterised by large eruptive columns that are powered upward partly by the thrust of expanding gases, and by convective forces with exit velocities of several hundred meters per second.
    - Large amount of ash and pumice and produced during the eruption.
    - The eruption may be accompanied by pyroclastic flows.
    - The ejection of large volumes of ash and magma may result in a caldera collapse.
    - Many stratovolcano tend to erupt in this manner.

  • Volcanic Hazards and Effects
    - Ash Fall
    - After the explosive lateral blast of the volcano, a strong and vertically directed explosion of ash and steam occurred, giving rise to a column of ash that was almost 20 kilometres high.
    - By the time the eruption stopped, the ash cloud had already spread to the central United States.
    -The ash particles in the atmosphere gave rise to lightning, causing many forest fires as a result.
    - During ash falls, visibility was reduced and roads had to be closed to traffics for up to weeks.
    - Air transportation was disrupted as several airports in eastern Washington shut down due to ash accumulation and poor visibility. Over a thousand commercial flights were also cancelled as a result.
    - The ash infiltrated many spaces and was highly abrasive, leading to the contamination of oil systems, the clogging of air filters and the abrasion of moving surfaces. Thus, many machinery were damaged as a result.
    - In areas where there was high ash accumulation, many crops were killed. On the other hand, crops survived in fields where ash accumulation was much lower. Output of these agricultural fields even increased as a result of higher summer precipitation brought on by the ash falls.
    - The ash falls added on to the economic cost of the volcanic eruption. US$2.2 million were spent to remove the ash and the entire process took up to 10 weeks in some areas.

  • Pyroclastic flows
    - A few hours after the start of the lateral blast, pyroclastic flows began to form and continued to occur during the 5 hours of intense eruptive activity. At least 17 pyroclastic flows were observed during the eruption.
    - These flows were deadly since the full volume and force of pyroclastic materials were directed sideways by the lateral eruption of Mount St. Helens. This resulted in flows with high velocities and high temperatures with the ability to destroy everything in their paths.
    - Steam-blast explosions were observed when the hot pyroclastic flows entered water bodies like the Spirit Lake. The explosions formed many pits on the sides of the pyroclastic flow deposits. Plumes of ash and steam as high as 1.9 kilometres were observed as well.
    - When the pyroclastic flows encountered the North Fork of the Toutle River, the debris were deposited in the river. The accumulation and eventual overflow of the debris collected in the river was to lead to the formation of destructive lahars.

  • Lahars
    - In the North Fork of the Toutle River, the water-saturated parts of the massive debris avalanche deposits began to collect and eventually overflow, giving rise to the largest and most destructive lahar.
    - 0.01 cubic kilometres of water, mud and debris were deposited into the Swift Reservoir when lahars moved along the south-eastern flank of the volcano and along the drainages of the Swift Creek, Pine Creek, and Muddy River.
    - The impact of the lahars’ flow front are so strong that lahars can even crush or carry away buildings. The forest around Mount St. Helens were destroyed. More than 200 homes and over 300 kilometres of road were destroyed by these lahars, rendering many people homeless.
    - Valuable land were buried by the layers of rock and mud from the lahars, lowering their value and rendering them useless for agriculture. This added on to the economic cost of the volcanic eruptions.

  • Combined effects of the volcanic hazards
    - The devastation on the people and their property were widespread. The death toll was 57 and many others were injured during the eruption.
    - The fauna of the forest around Mount St. Helens was affected as well. An estimated number of 7000 big animals like bears and deer died during the eruption along with birds and most small mammals.
    - Immediately after the eruption, tourism, an important industry in Washington, was badly affected. Conventions, meetings, and social gatherings also were canceled or postponed at cities and resorts elsewhere in Washington.
    - Official figures estimate the cost of the destruction wrecked by the eruption to be US$1.1 billion. The actual cost remain difficult to determine.
    - A few months after the eruption, there were reports of residents, who had coped successfully during the eruption, suffering from stress and emotional problems. Funding for mental health programs for these residents were requested.
    - The May 18th eruption also resulted in the collapse of the summit of Mount St. Helens, forming a caldera instead.

Geog Practice Question 2

Impact of Volcanic Hazards in Less Developed Countries

2) Mt Merapi, a volcano in central Java, Indonesia is the most active volcano in the country. Its eruptions have caused high death tolls, fatalities as well as destruction. Despite this, thousands of people live on the flanks of Mt Merapi.

Discuss about the dangers Mt Merapi’s eruptions impose and explain why people still live near volcanoes despite these dangers, with context to Mt Merapi.

_______________________________________________________


Essay outline

Intro:
Mt Merapi is a stratovolcano, composed of viscous andesitic lava. She is one of the volcanoes located within the Pacific Ring of Fire. Eruptions are typically effusive. Hazards faced at Mt Merapi are mainly, pyroclastic flows, lahars as well as landslides.

Hazard 1: Pyroclastic flows (refer to volcanic hazards Part 1: LDCs)

Hazard 2: Lahars (refer to volcanic hazards Part 2: LDCs)

Hazard 3: Landslides (refer to volcanic hazards Part 2: LDCs)


Link to next segment of question:
As seen from above, Mt Merapi poses a high level of danger to the people living on and near her flanks. However, many are unwilling to leave for safer grounds. Volcanoes have a wide range of effects on humans, negatively and positively. People live near Mt Merapi to reap the benefits that she provides.

Benefit 1: Tourism
People flock from all over the world to visit volcanoes. Mt Merapi is no exception. Being an LDC, Indonesia reaps a good amount of profit from Merapi-seeking tourists. A number of jobs are created for this industry. This includes work in hotels, food and beverage and gift shops. Locals are also often hired as tour guides.

Benefit 2: Agriculture
Being a LDC, agriculture is an important source of income for many Indonesians. The rich soil that Mt Merapi provides allows for healthy crops to be grown on its land. The ash formed from eruptions mixes with the soil on the land, making it very rich in minerals. Healthy crops cultivated and rich harvests are the main reason why many people are induced into living on the flanks of Mt Merapi. Besides, the people have become adept in the skills of harvest at volcanic flanks it will be difficult for them to move and change their type of occupation.

Benefit 3: Products
- Pumice: widely used for grinding and polishing metals, stones, and other materials.
- Metals: gold, silver, mercury, copper, zinc, lead
- Gemstones: opal
- Building materials: cinder tracks for athletics, naturally broken aggregates


Conclusion:
All in all, it can be seen that there is a substantial number of reasons why people wish to live near Mt Merapi despite it being an active volcano. Practicality thus attracts people to live near Mt Merapi. Other than the reasons stated above, other personal reasons like the people living there all their lives and religious beliefs as well as for the fact that there are many active volcanoes on the island of Java and should they move, would still be near an active volcano. Therefore even with the dangers posed; people are still willing to risk their lives for the reasons discussed above.

Geog Practice Question 1

Formation of Volcano

1) Cascade Range of USA, in which a linear belt of volcanoes can be found, is formed through the convergence of Juan de Fuca plate and North American plate, as shown in Figure 1. Explain how the convergence of the two plates leads to the formation of the volcanoes.

Figure 1
Source:http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Gif/PlateTectonics/Maps/map_plate_tectonics_cascades.gif


Answer:

  • Juan De Fuca Plate is an oceanic plate, while North American Plate is a continental plate. Oceanic plate is denser than continental plate. Therefore, when Juan De Fuca plate converges with North American plate, it subducts underneath the less dense North American plate.

  • As Juan De Fuca plate subducts, it is subjected to progressively higher temperatures and pressure. Water trapped in the sediments is probably squeezed out into the mantle wedge overlying the descending plate. Water has the effect of lowering the melting temperature of the mantle, thus causing it to melt. As the hybrid magma, derived partially from the overlying mantle rises, it reacts extensively with the overlying crust to produce a magma that is even more complex. This magma may contain components derived from oceanic sediments, from metamorphosed oceanic basalt, from the peridotite in the mantle wedge and from the overlying crust. On the way to the surface, the magma also may mix with other batches of magma.

  • Having lower density than the surrounding, the magma buoyantly rises through the overlying mantle to form a linear belt of volcanoes parallel to the oceanic trench between the Juan de Fuca plate and North American plate. This is how the linear belt of volcanoes in the Cascade Range may be formed.

  • This diagram can be drawn in the answer. (Other diagrams with the same idea are also accepted)

Source:
http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Gif/PlateTectonics/Maps/map_plate_tectonics_cascades.gif

Impact of Volcanic Hazards in Less Developed Countries

To discuss the effects of primary and secondary volcanic hazards on people and property in Less Developed Countries, we will use the case study of Mount Merapi.


Effects of Volcanic Hazards in Less Developed Countries

Example: Mount Merapi

Mount Merapi
Source: http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/southeast_asia/indonesia/Merapi1.jpg


Merapi, which is a stratovolcano, is Indonesia’s most active volcano and well known for partial collapse of lava domes and the generation of pyroclastic flows. The name M erapi means ‘Mountain of Fire’. It is tall (2.8 km or 1.7 miles high) and has steep slopes. The top of the volcano sometimes has a normal crater, but usually a lava dome fills the crater. The dome plugs up the volcano, making it difficult for other lava and ash to escape. A broad gouge funnels lava and ash flows from the top of Merapi to the south slopes of the volcano. The top of the mountain has no vegetation because erupted ash often falls there. Dense vegetation covers the flanks of the volcano. Many farmers live in villages around the volcano. The volcanic ash makes rich soil for growing crops, but it is a dangerous place to live. Yogyakarta city, with a population of 3 million, is 15 miles (25 km) south of Merapi. About 50,000 people live on the southwest flank of the volcano.

Lava dome at the summit of Merapi. During 1982, the lava dome was growing about 80,000-100,000 cubic meters per month. The dome collapsed in late November, creating nuee ardentes.
Source: http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/southeast_asia/indonesia/Merapi2.jpg


Like all volcanoes, Merapi has eruptions of different sizes. The volcano has had numerous moderate to large (1 million cubic m) eruptions. Small eruptions happen every 2-3 years, bigger ones every 10-15 years, and very large ones every 50-60 years. The biggest eruptions occurred in the years 1006, 1786, 1822, 1872 and 1930. The eruption of 1006 spread ash all over the central part of the island of Java. The destruction was so bad that the existing Hindu kingdom was destroyed and the island was taken over by Muslims.


Eruptions mainly begin with pyroclastic flows followed by widespread pyroclastic air fall. Plinian to subplinian eruptions are common. These older deposits indicate that Merapi is capable of eruption styles very different from those currently observed.

Pyroclastic flow deposit on Merapi.
Source: http://volcano.und.edu/vwdocs/volc_images/southeast_asia/indonesia/Merapi3.jpg


A history of violent eruptions led to Mount Merapi being designated as one of the "Decade Volcanoes." These volcanoes have been identified by the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth's Interior as requiring special study because of the danger they pose to populated regions. Mount Merapi's last large ash eruption occurred in 1984. A particularly devastating eruption took place in 1930, when 1,300 were killed by an eruption here. Another eruption, in 1976, killed 28 people and destroyed homes of 1,176 people. Since 1984, Mount Merapi had erupted repeatedly as glowing avalanches flowed from a growing lava dome. These glowing avalanches, or nuee ardentes, moved down a different river drainage towards the west.


Eruption on 22 November 1984

Mount Merapi erupted on November 22 at about 10:15 a.m. local time. Inconsistent news reports on the number of casualties suggest that at least 34 people were killed, several hundred were injured, and hundreds of homes were destroyed. The eruption began with steam explosions and ejection of rocks and gravel over the surface of the cone. The steam plume reached about 800 meters high. After 25 minutes of such activity, the main eruption began and sent an ash column roughly 10 kilometers high. An advisory was issued to warn aircraft from entering the ash plume and being subject to engine damage and endangering the lives of those onboard. Ash fallout was heavy as far as 45 kilometers to the northwest of Mount Merapi. On the ground, a pyroclastic flow of hot ash, gas, and other suspended particles swept 6 kilometers to the southwest down the Boyong River drainage and through Turgo Village in the Yogyakarta District. Many of the injured suffered severe burns from the hot gases. Most of the casualties appear to be in two small villages. Over 6,000 people were evacuated from the area.

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Impact of Volcanic Hazards in Developed Countries

To discuss the effects of primary and secondary volcanic hazards on people and property in Developed Countries, we will use the case study of Mount St. Helens.

Effects of Volcanic Hazards in Developed Countries
Example: Mount St. Helens

Mount St. Helens is a stratovolcano in Washington, the United States of America. The volcano is most famous for its eruption on 18 May 1980, which is the worst volcanic disaster and one of the most significant geologic events in the United States during the 20th century. The actual cost of the destruction wrecked by the eruption remain difficult to determine even though official figures estimate the cost to be US$1.1 billion.

Mount St. Helens on May 17, 1980, one day before the devastating eruption.
Source: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/Images/MSH80_st_helens_from_johnston_ridge_05-17-80_med.jpg

Before 1980, Mount St. Helens, known for its serenity and symmetry, was known as the “Fujiyama of America”. The majority of 20th century residents and visitors did not think of Mount St. Helens as a volcanic hazard but as a peaceful mountain for leisure activities.


However, as early as 16 March 1980, the first signs of volcanic activ
ity in the form of earthquakes were observed. It was only on March 27 when the volcano began to emit ash and steam. There was visible deformation and swelling of the volcano due to the movement of magma from the magma chamber into the volcano. The north face of Mount St. Helens was especially affected by the deformation and the area became known as the “bulge”.

A "bulge" developed on the north side of Mount St. Helens as magma pushed up within the peak.
Source: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/Images/MSH80_bulge_on_north_side_04-27-80_med.jpg


As seen from the above photograph, the visible “bulge” developed on the north side of the volcano. From angle and slope-distance measurements, it was observed that the “bulge” was growing at a rate of nearly 1.5 metres per day.


On May 18, the deformed and unstable north flank of the volcano suddenly collapsed, apparently due to an earthquake of magnitude 5.1 beneath the volcano. This collapse of the north flank gave rise to a landslide-debris avalanche, which moved northwards at speeds of 175 to nearly 250 km per hour, recorded.


The sudden removal of the “bulge” on the north face of the volcano abruptly released the pent-up pressure of the volcanic system of Mount St. Helens and triggered an almost immediate and explosive lateral blast. The blast’s quickly increased from its initial velocity of about 354 kilometres per hour to about 1078 kilometres per hour. The lateral blast, loaded with volcanic debris, caused widespread destruction as far as 30 kilometres from the volcano.


Ash fall and its effects


A strong, vertically directed explosion of ash and steam began very shortly after the lateral blast. The resulting column of ash rose very quickly into the atmosphere, attaining a height of almost 20 kilometres.


Near the volcano, the ash particles in the atmosphere gave rise to lightning which started many forest fires in return. More ash was emitted into the atmosphere as the eruption continued for 9 hours, adding to the growth of the ash cloud. By the time the eruption subsided and stopped on May 19, the ash cloud had spread to the central United States.


Some of the ash also drifted around the globe, only reaching the Earth’s surface after several weeks. However, the smallest fragments and aerosols remained suspended in the atmosphere for years which eventually had an impact on modifying the global climate. The aerosols participate in complex chemical reactions in the stratosphere, altering chlorine and nitrogen chemical compounds. This effect led to the formation of radicals and, accompanied by chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) pollution, contributed to the depletion of the ozone layers as the radicals break down ozone molecules that protect us from ultraviolet rays from the sun.


Pyroclastic flows and its effects


Pyroclastic flows were observed a few hours after the start of the lateral blast and continued to occur intermittently during the next 5 hours of strong eruptive activity. At least 17 separate pyroclastic flows occurred during the May 18 eruption, and their aggregate volume was about 0.21 cubic kilometres.


When the hot pyroclastic flows encountered water bodies such as Spirit Lake, it led to steam-blast explosions as water flashed explosively into steam. Plumes of ash and steam were sent as high as 1.9 kilometres above the ground. These steam-blast eruptions formed many explosion pits on the sides of the pyroclastic flow deposits, at the south shore of Spirit Lake, and along the upper part of the North Fork of the Toutle River.


Pyroclastic flows were very dangerous as they were directed sideways by the lateral eruption of Mount St. Helens. The force and full volume of the pyroclastic materials are forced down the volcano and the resulting high velocities and temperatures of the flow can destroy everything in their paths.


Lahars and their effects


The largest and most destructive lahar developed several hours later in the North Fork of the Toutle River, when the water-saturated parts of the massive debris avalanche deposits began to collect and eventually overflow. The resulting lahar in the Toutle River drainage area dumped more than 0.05 cubic kilometres of sediment along the lower Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers.


Lahars occurred along the southeast flank of the volcano-along the Swift Creek, Pine Creek, and Muddy River drainages and emptied nearly 0.01 cubic kilometres of water, mud, and debris into the Swift Reservoir. Fortunately, the volume of the additional load was insufficient to cause overtopping even if the reservoir had been full, thus preventing further damage to property and loss of lives.


Lahars can case high economic and environmental damage and in the case of the May 18 eruption of Mount St. Helens, it destroyed the forests around the volcano. The impact of a lahar’s flow front can remove and destroy anything in its path, in fact lahars can even crush or carry away buildings. Valuable land may be buried by layers of rock debris, lowering their value and rendering them unusable for agriculture, adding on to the economic cost of lahars. These flows can destroy bridges and roads, trapping people in areas that may be vulnerable to other volcanic hazards.


Aftermath of the May 18 Eruption

The May 18, 1980, eruption was the most destructive in the history of the United States. Landscape changes caused by the eruption was obvious especially from high-altitude photographs and the devastation on people and their property widespread, claiming 57 lives and injuring many others.

More than 200 homes and over 185 miles (300 kilometers) of roads were destroyed by the 1980 lahars.

Source: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/Images/MSH81_damaged_home_south_fork_toutle_river_07-19-81_med.jpg


More than 200 homes and over 300 kilometres of roads were destr
oyed by the 1980 lahars. Pictured here is a damaged home along the South Fork Toutle River. The lateral blast, debris avalanche, mudflows, and flooding caused extensive damage to land and man-made structures, rendering many people homeless.


There was also a large impact on the fauna in the Mount St. Helens area. It is estimated that nearly 7,000 large animals like bears and deer perished in the area most affected by the eruption, as well as all birds and most small mammals. Many small animals, mainly burrowing rodents, frogs, salamanders, and crawfish, managed to survive because they were bel
ow ground level or water surface when the disaster struck.


In areas of thick ash accumulation, many agricultural crops, such as wheat, apples, potatoes, and alfalfa, were destroyed. As for areas blanketed only by a thin layer of as
h, many crops survived. In fact, the apple and wheat production in 1980 was higher than normal due to greater-than-average summer precipitation as a result of the ash falls. Effects of the ash fall on the water quality of streams, lakes, and rivers were short lived and minor.


May 18, 1980- ash along the roadside, Connell, Washington.
Source:
http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/Images/MSH80_may18_ash_road_connell_washington_06-80_med.jpg


The photograph shows ash along the roadside in Connell, Washing
ton. Visibility was reduced during the ash falls, forcing roads to close to traffic for up to weeks. Air transportation was disrupted as several airports in eastern Washington shut down due to ash accumulation and poor visibility. Over a thousand commercial flights were also cancelled as a result.


The volcanic ash caused problems for internal-combustion engines
and other mechanical and electrical equipment. The ash was able to infiltrate most openings and was highly abrasive, thus contaminating oil systems, clogging air filters, and scratching moving surfaces. In fact, there were cases where blackouts were caused by the coating of fine ash on electric transformers, causing short circuit. The sewage-disposal systems of several areas were plagued by ash clogging and damage to pumps, filters, and other equipment.


The removal and disposal of the ash was not easy. Ash removal cost $2.2 million and took 10 weeks in Yakima. To minimize the effect of wind on ash dumps, the surfaces of some disposal sites have been covered with topsoil and seeded with grass. About 191 138 square meters of ash have been stockpiled at five sites for constructional and other benefic
ial economic uses in the future.


The eruption had indirect costs in the form of its effects on residents in the affected areas. Unemployment in the immediate region of Mount St. Helens rose quickly in the weeks following the eruption before returned to normal once the operations to clean up the ash and to salvage timber began. Several months after May 18, a few residents reported suffering stress and emotional problems, even though they had coped successfully during the crisis. Funding for mental health programs were requested to help these people.


Immediately after the eruption, tourism, an important industry in Was
hington, was badly affected. Conventions, meetings, and social gatherings also were canceled or postponed at cities and resorts elsewhere in Washington. The negative impact on Washington’s tourism proved only to be temporary as the tourists began to return to Mount St. Helens, possibly attracted by its reawakening.

Mount St. Helens is considered to be one of the most beautiful and interesting of the Cascade volcanic peaks.
Source: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/Images/MSH82_st_helens_spirit_lake_reflection_05-19-82_med.jpg

Mount St. Helens is no longer symmetrical and has an amphitheatre-shaped caldera instead. It is still considered to be one of the most beautiful and interesting of the Cascade volcanic peaks. Mount St. Helens and the devastated area is now within the 110,000-acre Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument, under jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service. Visitor centers, interpretive areas, and trails are being established as thousands of tourists, students, and scientists visit the monument daily.